|

|
KiesKleurig
a colourful
choise
handbook for international
teaching materials
Auteurs: Ineke Mok & Peter Reinsch
©Parel, Utrecht 1999
|
Chapter 4
Geography and
History
By Ineke Mok and Peter
Reinsch
In this chapter Ineke Mok
and Peter Reinsch put geography and history under the
magnifying glass. On the basis of examples, some of which
have been drawn from textbooks for social studies, they
illustrate the problems clinging to a monocultural
presentation of subjects such as immigration, housing,
colonialism, economic development in the Third World and
population growth.
Passages are quoted in order
to exemplify and clarify problems and alternatives, not as a
judgement on the quality of the method in its entirety. Some
books are intercultural in certain aspects, but not in
others, while most have intercultural potential as we will
see. Several of these are relevant to social studies is
schools.
Geography, history and
social studies are subjects that deal explicitly with
people, with their histories, their cultures and their
relationships. Intercultural objectives can be developed for
these subjects. Moreover, they are rendered more interesting
by an intercultural approach.
In this chapter the
distinction between the subjects has been diminished to a
large extent, though there are some obvious didactic
differences. In primary education, geography and history are
brought together in 'orientation to the world'. In secondary
education, various topics can fall within the domain of
geography, history and social studies.
4.1
Recognisability
Illustrations
Like other subjects,
teaching geography and history requires an attempt to
connect with the pupils' own knowledge and experience. In
primary schools this is usually concrete and close to home:
a street, a village, the school, the neighbourhood adjacent
to the school, a house, a bedroom. Slowly, the field of
vision is extended, beyond the borders of The Netherlands,
to other countries and parts of the world outside Europe. In
the initial phase illustrations are very important. The
pictures are often used as the basis for a classroom
discussion. The teacher makes connections and places the
material in a context.
The assessment of
intercultural points of departure and the possibilities
provided by a method begin with the illustrations. Are there
children and people in the pictures with assorted
appearances and a variety of customs? In other words, is the
diversity of Dutch society represented, and can pupils
really recognise something from their own surroundings.
These questions arise from the fundamentals of intercultural
education, or simply from good educational
didactics.
A successful approach of
this type can be found in part one of Geobas, a book
intended for use by group 3 children. It contains
illustrations of people in The Netherlands who belong to
different ethnic groups, such as children on Koninginnedag
(a holiday for the Queen's official birthday), a Hindu
wedding, a group of West Frisian dancers. In the story,
which concerns a group of children, there are also names
such as Aricha and Samir. In the material dealing with
'professions' there are also photographs of people with skin
colours other than white. In this way the diversity of our
society is brought into the picture. That is not the case if
children with another skin colour can only be seen as
'children from a far-away country'. (1)
Stories
Stories enliven the material
or introduce a new theme and give pupils the opportunity for
personal engagement with another country or period. The main
character is usually the point of identification for the
readers. One should be able to take it for granted that the
girls and boys functioning as central characters could
easily have names and backgrounds that are Turkish, Dutch,
Surinamese or Chinese. And this should occur as a matter of
course, not to put these characters and their backgrounds in
a problematical context.
The following story is an
introduction to the theme of migrant workers in a geography
book for the first year of secondary education. We doubt
whether many Turkish pupils want to identify with the
characters and circumstances sketched:
'Sometimes they call out
"Turkey, turkey", but most of the Dutch girls are friendly
towards Ayse. She is allowed to go to a birthday party. In
Turkey most children don't celebrate birthdays. A lot of
people don't even know on which day they were born exactly.
Often Ayse has to stay at home. But father doesn't mind her
going to a party every now and again. She can't take a
present with her. So Ayse asks if she can have a little
pocket money in the future so that she can buy a small
something or other. Father almost get's angry: "You don't
need money. I look after you. Since you started mixing with
Dutch children you've been learning some cheek."'
(2)
If Ayse had really told her
own story, it would probably have been less negative and
stereotypical and her activities would not have been so
deeply influenced by the behaviour of the Dutch girls and
her father. Instead, she has become a strange and pathetic
personage, compared to the Dutch girls.
The follow-up to the account
offers little that is cheerful. In the description and the
photograph Turkey is depicted solely as a poor country. It
is therefore remarkable that Ayse says that later she wants
to live in Turkey; a fairly implausible decision considering
the context provided.
Stories open up
opportunities for children to make an acquaintance with
personal experiences and initiatives. The story above fails
to make use of this opportunity; instead it reinforces
stereotypes. No-one would want to identify with Ayse.
When making a choice of stories, it is not sufficient merely
to check if there are girls and boys from diverse ethnic
groups, but also to look at their role in the story. Does
the story offer children opportunities for identification
with a wide range of different people? This means that we
must avoid the trap of distinguishing between what 'we'
think about something and what 'they' think about it. Often
that distinction is not necessary at all. Why should one
assume in a theme such as 'food' that all the 'Dutch' eat
pork and all Muslims do not? Or, why should a geography
lesson about potatoes in 'Waarom Daar?' (Why There) open
with:
'While people in Asia eat
rice, here we eat potatoes.' (3)
Many people in The
Netherlands avoid pork, and others eat rice as often as
potatoes.
The examples given above are
easily corrected in the classroom and can be complemented
with other material.
Countries of
Origin
Children and young people
are easily engaged by situations outside their own street or
town. Not only has their world been broadened by television,
but many children know about life elsewhere from their own
experiences of migration, or vacation, or from stories.
Children who have recently come to live in The Netherlands
are still very close to their land of origins. It is obvious
that this country should be introduced into geography and
history lessons. At present, the opportunity for the
inclusion such countries exists in the curricula and
learning-strategies formulated for secondary education. For
example, books have been written recently that deal
explicitly with Morocco, Turkey or Surinam, for example. For
some children this will provide an enhanced opportunity for
recognition. However, not all children would jump at the
following request:
'Are there children in your
class from another country? Perhaps they would like to tell
us something about it?'(4)
This is an excellent example
of an assignment that addresses only some of the pupils
directly ('us'), while others ('them') are merely allowed to
join in. Whether or not children from other countries are
willing to take part in assignments of this nature is
something that needs to be explored carefully. Some children
have no inclination at all to stand in the spotlight in this
way, while others would be happy to talk enthusiastically
about what they know.
4.2
Migration
The
Introduction
Migration entails the
movements of people from one place to another and from
pre-historic times up until the present day it is something
that takes place wherever people are to be found. People
come and go on foot, driven by war, oppression and economic
necessity.
This theme deserves special
attention in the classroom. There are opportunities for
recognition in this material for many pupils, because either
they themselves or their families live or have lived
elsewhere. Alternatively, the subject of migration is often
the cause of a great deal of misunderstanding and prejudice:
'streams of immigrants are crossing the boundaries of our
hospitality'. It is crucial, therefore, that the information
should be checked for its factuality and for those points in
need of augmentation and refinement.
Immigration is often the
starting point of a chapter on The Netherlands as a
multi-ethnic society. Notice the different ways the subject
is introduced in the following two school textbooks for
primary education.
'Foreigners have been coming
to The Netherlands for thousands of years: the beaker
people, the Teutonic peoples, Romans, Jews, Gypsies, French
refugees and German pedlars.' (5)
'In the past only Dutch
people lived in The Netherlands. Now there are Chinese,
Turks, Moroccans, Japanese, Surinamese and Greeks living
here, to name but a few. These people are different to the
Dutch in many ways.' (6)
While the first book puts
immigration into the historical perspective of migration,
the second suggests that The Netherlands is now faced with
immigration as a unique phenomenon.
Moreover, it is directly
linked to a problem: 'those' people are different to the
Dutch. This quote is not only factually inaccurate, it
requires of the teacher that s/he should give a positive
twist to a negative beginning. The first quotation
immediately opens options in a broad context.

Danmark
From:·K. Nejsum,
Holbaek College of Education, Holbaek, Danmark
Source:·Munkgård
2. del 1995
"Vi har ikke så meget
overs for dem, der ikke er rigtig forfulgt. Hvis de mest
kommer hertil med dr men om at skabe et liv under bedre
vilkår. Så kalder vi danskere dem af og til for
bekvemmelighedsflygtninge. Det er egentlig et lidt ondt ord.
Som om det er noget nedvaerdigende at dromme om og
håbe på et liv vaek fra sult og udsigtlos
fattig." (Nejsum)
Translation: "We do not have
a very high opinion of those refugees who are not really
persecuted. If they come here dreaming of creating a life
under better conditions, we Danes refer to them as 'refugees
of convenience'. In fact, the term is rather pejorative,
implying that it is degrading to dream about and hope for a
life away from hunger and hopeless
poverty."(Nejsum)

B y putting migration in a
historical context, possibly citing statistics, a sense of
continuity is clearly established. Extending the scope to
other countries, including those beyond Europe, serves to
refine the perspective still further. For example, it
dispels the image of The Netherlands and the West as those
places harbouring the largest numbers of
refugees.
'Migration through the world
has never been so extensive. The majority of migrants move
around among the poorer countries. Only an occasional
refugee manages to request asylum in one of the richer
Western countries. The poorest countries are the most
heavily burdened. Most people flee to a neighbouring
country.' (7)
The
Origins
Moluccans have a different
background to the Surinamese, or to Germans and the
backgrounds of ethnic Turks are different to those of
Turkish Kurds.
Anyone who wants to throw
the subtleties of migration into relief stumbles inevitably
against colonialism, politics and economics.
Often, the impression is
created that the newcomers reap the profits while the
country of destination is continuously and generously
spending. The following quotes make short shrift of this
misconception:
'In the beginning it was
mostly young, unmarried men from abroad who were taken on.
Later, girls were also brought to The Netherlands to do the
dirty work in hospitals and for cleaning companies.'
(8)
The following piece of text
was taken from a history book. It puts migration in a
distinctly historical perspective and stresses the
contributions made to Dutch society by those Dutch people
whose ancestors were immigrants.
The Netherlands: A Land
of Immigrants
Many Dutch people looking
into their family tree will find ancestors who were
immigrants. In the third cabinet of Mr Lubbers (1989-1993)
there are a few examples: Ritzen (minister for education)
has ancestors from the Alsace, Hirsh Ballan (Justice) had a
Jewish father who sought refuge in The Netherlands in the
thirties, and d'Ancona (Welfare, Health and Culture) had a
Italian grandfather who was a shoemaker when he came to The
Netherlands. Sometimes the surname gives no clear indication
of foreign ancestry. Many German immigrants have changed
their surname, for example, from Schmidt to Smit.
Immigrants have been coming
for centuries and have found a place in Dutch society. At
first they often belong to the lower social orders. They
felt they were aliens ('allochtonen'): they came from
another country. From the example of the three ministers you
can see that there are children and grandchildren who have
used the opportunities that exist in our country to climb
the ladder. They integrated themselves into society and felt
less like foreigners ('allochtone') and more like
native-born Dutch people ('autochtonen'). (...) By bringing
their customs with them, all immigrants have made a
contribution to the Dutch multicultural society as it came
into being in the seventies and eighties. (9)
When dealing with the
subject of migration one can include the pupils' own
personal histories. They could make inquiries about their
parents' birthplace(s) as well as their (great)grandparents.
And they could make an inventory of the professions
practised by their parents and ancestors. On the basis of
this information, they can look for the motives that
precipitate movement, including internal migration. This is
an assignment that addresses all the pupils.

Germany
From:·ed.
Source:
Erdkunde (Diercke) 8, Industriestaaten und
Entwicklungsländer, Gymnasium, Nordrhein-Westfalen,
1986
The type of problems that
could arise in an American city, Chicago, for example, are
delineated.
"Mancherorts sind bereits
erste Anzeichen eines beginnenden Verfalls zu spüren:
Häuser verwahrlosen, rassische Minderheiten und
ärmere Bevölkerungsschichten dringen in diese
Wohnviertel ein." (p.47)
Translation:·In some
places the first signs of decay can be seen: neglected
housing, ethnic minorities and poorer sections of the
population move into these residential areas."
(p.47)
In the "Model of a North
American city", it is shown that there are business centres,
shopping malls and industrial centres, among others, to be
found here. The inhabitants are divided in the following
way:
"rassischer Minderheiten
(Ghettos)
vorn Einwohnern mit
geringen Einkommen
mittlerem Einkommen
hohem Einkommen" (p.48)
Translation:
"Ethnic minorities(ghettos)
of inhabitants with
small incomes
medium incomes
high incomes" (p.48)
In these examples one could
also inquire as to why 'rassischer Minderheiten' (racial
minorities) are singled out. What does this distinction
mean? In the first quotation it is evident that
'Minderheiten' are unequivocally associated with
problems

Adjustment as a
Solution
Values, norms and customs
change. When we speak of the integration of immigrants we
referring to a process that includes native-born Dutch
people ('autochtonen') as well as people from ethnic
minority groups ('allochtonen'). This approach, however, is
never found in school textbooks. Instead a vague political
slogan, the notion of 'adjustment', is dished up as a
solution.
'When people from another
culture behave increasing like Dutch people, we speak of
integration. As a result of this, the differences in Dutch
society are reduced.' (10)
In the above, it is proposed
that integration or adjustment is a one-sided process of
assimilation. The diversity of cultures already present in
the 'majority' is ignored. To whom do you adjust
yourself?
4.3
Europe as the Centre of the World
The
Crusades
Traditionally, history books
start in the prehistoric age. Then, there follows the great
empires of the Egyptians, Greeks and Romans as a prelude to
European civilisation. At primary school level in
particular, history means the history of the fatherland.
Pupils only make an acquaintance with other countries,
peoples and continents in the course of European conquests,
after which they vanish again.
The point is that the
historical encounters and confrontations between cultures
should be dealt with in such a way that the religious and
economic drive of European men is viewed from varying
perspectives. This is not simple considering the heritage of
historical research that puts European interests first and,
moreover, skirts around less noble actions and ideas, while
foregrounding those same proclivities in 'others'. For
example, the role played by the Dutch in the slave trade is
skipped through hastily, and an emendation to the heroic
image of the Dutch during World War II is only slowly being
adopted.
Happily, there are some
changes taking place. History is being loosened from its
Eurocentric and monopolist connotations. It is becoming more
critical and accords more room for 'other' voices. The
school textbooks are reaping the benefits. The crusades are
no longer presented purely as a brave battle for religious
principles fought by pious Christians against aggressive
Moslems.9 The image of European men on a sacred mission has
been dropped, even if in the following quote the Moslems
seen to be more aggressive.
'During the first crusade
the Christians were exceptionally cruel to the Moslems, who
in their own turn tried to slaughter the Christians.'
(11)
A respect for the scientific
and cultural wealth of the Arab world can already be found
in somewhat older books.
The crusades entailed
a strengthening of the exchange between Europe and the
Arabic world. This is also emphasised in the quote above.
The crusades are a good opportunity to introduce the theme
of cultural exchange and to make it clear that Europe was
and still is dependent for its development on inventions and
insights from other cultures and continents.

Belgium
From:·J.
van Dooren, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Interfacultair
Departement Lerarenopleiding (Interfaculty Department of
Teacher-Training).
Source:·Martens
J. en J. Steenssens, Fundamenten 3B. Middeleeuwen.
Leuven: Wolters, 1991 (third-year general secondary
education for 15-year old pupils)
Arabic cultures can be dealt
with in another context as can be seen from the following
example from a Belgian history book.
According to Van
Dooren:
"The author includes a
chapter on 'Arabic-Spain As the Stimulus for a Cultural
Renaissance in Western Europe'. In so doing, he does justice
to the extent of 'Moorish' influence in Western Europe. A
few examples:
"...In agriculture, the
Moors, as the Spanish called the Arabs, achieved remarkable
results. The massive irrigation system recreated Al Andalus
as a blossoming garden. They introduced new crops such as
sugar cane, apricots, peaches and date palms. They used
paper instead of parchment and invented reading-glasses.
While, to the north of the Pyrenees only a small minority of
the population of Europe lived in towns, Cordoba alone had
half a million inhabitants,....Their own Christian culture,
the Mozarabic, flourished and was greatly influenced by
Arabic culture. Craftsmen such as silk weavers and gold- and
silversmiths expanded on an hitherto unprecedented
scale...Without Andalus the progress made by Medieval Europe
would have been unthinkable...The entire knowledge of the
Arabic world was brought to Al Andalus by the Moors: the
numerous writings of Avincenna (908-1037), the genius from
distant Uzbekistan; the works of the Greeks, Aristotle and
Ptolomy, with commentaries made by their own scholars, often
correcting mistakes made by the ancients..." (pp.
120-121)
Van Dooren:
"Pupils who work with this
material are certainly not going to be given the impression
that Muslim culture was foreign, threatening, hostile and
intolerant, backwards and limited. On the contrary, they
will understand the success of the Moors advancement and
value the influence Moorish culture brought to bear on our
own. Even more!"

Columbus
'Columbus thought that he
had discovered India and called the inhabitants of America
"Indians". Some Indian peoples were highly-developed. They
already had large cities. (...) Actually, America was
discovered by the Vikings.' (12)
The assertion that Columbus
was the first man to discover the western hemisphere is
perhaps the textbook example of Eurocentrism. This quote
makes a modest correction: the Vikings were first (on behalf
of Europe). Usually more refinement is necessary even if
only to avoid the impression that the Europeans set out to
cultivate a Garden of Eden and that the peoples already
living there were merely obstacles. That is the case in the
following passage describing the voyage of Houtman and
Keyser in which their opponents are referred to
condescendingly as nameless 'natives'. (13)
'At the end of June they
reached Java and sailed into the port of Bantam. They had
achieved their goal. The journey had lasted 14 months
altogether. But then misfortune followed misfortune. The
natives attacked the Dutch ships. Many men were killed or
wounded. On 22 February 1597 the ships set sail again for
The Netherlands.'
A disproportionate
relationship comes into existence between Europe and other
parts of the world when Africa, America, Australia and Asia
are predominantly represented through their connections to
European travellers, traders and conquerors. European norms
are used to measure development, as is the case with the
observation that Indians already had large
cities.
Mostly, current classroom
material is quite critical as far as the voyage of discovery
are concerned and are more inclined to refer to them as
voyages of conquest. The outrages committed in the name of
Christendom and progress are no longer ignored.
Disproportionately scant is the attention paid to the
experiences and perspectives of those who were subordinated.
In paying some attention to these experiences and
perspectives a counterbalance is offered to the represented
assumption that it is perfectly natural to conquer
territories overseas. This is equally valid for the slavery
enforced on Indians and Africans, which is no longer
presented as a necessary phenomenon.
Colonialism

Italy
From:·L.
Cajani, Università degli studi di Roma "La sapienza",
dipartimento di studi storico
Source:·Cremonese,
A. Conoscere e conservare il paesaggio europeo, Mursia,
Milano, 1990, p.5
Cajani:·"Il
discorso sul colonialisme non si esaurisce però con
un "mea culpa" da parte degli europei. C'è un altro
aspetto, sovente ricordato in passato dalla propaganda
colonialista e la cui eco non si è ancora spenta, e
cioè benefici che comunque il colonialismo può
aver portat a popolazioni arretrate. Qualche autore mostra
delle incetezze nel fare una valutazione complessiva del
colonialismo. Alberto Cremonese, ad esempio, nel suo manuale
di geografia si unisce dapprima alla condanna della violenza
che ha caratterizzato l'espansione europea,
scrivendo:
"lanciati alla
conquista della Terra alcuni popoli del Vecchio Continente
non esitarono a calpestare i diritti di altre popolazioni o
ad annientare intere civiltà: basta pensare ai Maya,
agli Aztechi e agl'Incas dell'America centromeridionale,
alle civiltà negre dell'Africa, sulle quali si
abbatté per lunghi secoli anch il flagello dell
'tratta degli schiavi', ai Samoiedi e agli Eschimesi della
Siberia asiatica, ai Pellerossa del Nordamerica."
Poi però
osserva che questa espansione non è stata del tutto
negativa, dal momento che ha portato la civiltá
europea al resto del mondo, tanto da riscattare la violenza
con cui è stata compiuta. Egli scrive
infatti:
"Se è
vero...che l'espansione europea ha spesso recato
gravissimidanni alle terre ove si è insediata e ad
alcune popoluzioni con cui è giunta a contatto,
è anche vero che ha portato grandi benefici nella
maggior parte del mondo, introducendovi i prodotti migliori
della propria civiltà."
Translation:
"All the same, the
discussion on colonialism does not end with a mere 'mea
culpa' on the part of the Europeans. There is another
aspect, which has often been reffered to in the past in the
colonial propaganda and which still can be heard every now
and then: the benefits that colonialism has brought to
underdeveloped peoples, in spite of all the negative
effects. Some authors are hesitant to make a comprehensive
analysis of colonialism. Alberto Cremonese for instance, in
his manual of geography, at first joins those who criticize
the violence that has characterized the European expansion.
He says:
"Some peoples of the
Ancient Continent threw themselves into the conquest of the
earth and while doing so they did not hesitate to trample on
the rights of other peoples or even to annihilate entire
civilizations: just think of the Maya, the Aztecs, the Inca
of the southern part of Central America and the black
civilizations of Africa. The latter also suffered from the
curse of slave traffic. Furthermore, we can think of the
Samoyeds and of the Eskimo's living in Asian Siberia and of
the North-American Indians."
Subsequently however,
Cremonese states that his expansion was not altogether
negative, in view of the fact that colonialism brought the
European civilization to the rest of the world, to such an
extent that it compensates for the violence that took place
during colonization. That is to say, he says:
"On the one hand it
may be true... that European expansion often caused
tremendous damage to the territories that were colonized and
to the peoples the Europeans came into contact with, but on
the other hand it is also true that European expansion
brought huge benefits to the majority of the world, by
introducing the best aspects of European
civilization.

Any description of
colonialism should have a multicultural instead of a
Eurocentric approach. The perspective chosen is made obvious
through the use of names and words, as 'the primitive negro
civilisation'. An example of a better approach:
'This racism was expressed
in countless ways everywhere that Europeans and Africans
were found together. It could vary from giving European
names to black domestic servants, because the African names
were considered too complicated, to whipping or foot traps
whenever their efforts were insufficient to satisfy European
tastes.' (14)
Even when it is stated in so
many words that the European powers had the express
intention of wringing as much profit as possible from the
colonies, there are still countless ways to justify these
practices.
Some authors let us peep
shamelessly over the shoulders of the colonisers.
Colonisation and de-colonisation processes taking place in
Indonesia should be described from the perspective of the
Indonesians themselves. Quotations from the works of the
Indonesian writer Pramoedja Ananta Toer, for example, offer
such a perspective and encourage pupils to delve deeper into
the Indonesian side of history. (15)

Belgium
From:·J. van
Dooren, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Interfacultair
departement lerarenopleiding.
The examples above
from Dutch school textbooks illustrate the difficulties
experienced, even in the present day, in dealing with our
'own' colonial historyinclear terms. All of these texts seek
to distort and conceal. In many countries school textbooks
seem to have difficulty putting the darker side of their
national history into words.
Van
Dooren:·"How do Flemish school textbooks depict
the ill-treatment of the Congolese in our own colonial
era?
It is well-known that
Leopold II's colonial exploitation of 'his' 'Free State of
the Congo' was accompanied by appalling crimes. How do
Flemish textbooks depict these appalling facts a hundred
years later? In particular, we must ask ourselves what
unsupervised pupils glean from these texts. Are the
conclusions clear; the facts and circumstances concrete?
After reading and studying such a book, can a student
imagine the reality, or is this concealed by language and
unrevealed facts? The following quotations from three
existing school textbooks, constitute the only references to
the ill-treatment and abuses in the former Belgian Congo. In
the first example there is a paucity of information. What do
pupils imagine 'scandalous treatment' to be? The other books
offer more concrete information."
Source
1·"In the meantime the Congolese were treated
scandalously in the course of economic exploitation, of
which both Leopold II and the large companies were
guilty."
Laitem, L.E.M.
Tijdspiegel 5. Van Verlichting tot wereldoorlog.
Kapellen: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel/Uitgeverij Pelckmans,
1993, p.135 (secondary education for 17-year old
pupils).
Source
2·"Nonetheless, criticism of Leopold II's
politics in the Congo came from all sides of the
international community, in particular from the British.
Cruelty, extortion and inhumane conditions came to light.
Moreover, financial problems would ensure that in his will
Leopold would leave the Congo to the Belgian
State."
subscript:·"Victims
of the colonial regime: inhabitants showing amputated hands
of Congolese punished for producing too little rubber.
Colonisation was centred on rubber production. The methods
used to harvest the rubber were often very cruel. The
British Consul, Casement, produced a report in 1903 (The
Casement Report) that challenged certain abuses. Corporeal
punishments, mutilation (amputation of hands and ears) and
plundering all took place as part of colonialism in the
Congo."
Smedts, P., R. Van den
Eynden and W. Van Damme., Van tijd tot tijd 4B.
Deurne: Uitgeverij Novum, 1994, p.130.
Source 3"The
country and the population were terrorized in a pitiless
fashion and bled dry; a few made fortunes. That was
eventually the downfall of Leopold II. Debts and, in
particular, the severe criticism of his policies and
inhumane conditions forced Leopold II to hand the Congo over
to the Belgian State in 1908".
subscript:·"Children
without hands in the Free State of the Congo. Left: Hands
bound too tightly turned gangrenous and fell off. Right:
this girl was beaten to death after her village had been
punished for producing too little rubber. Her hand was then
cut off."
Martens J., J. Neutelaers,
e.a. Fundamenten 5. De wording van de moderne samenleving
1750-1918. (Fundamentals 5. The Development of Modern
Society 1750-1918. Leuven: Wolters, 1993, pp. 281-282.
(Secondary School, 17 years)
Van
Dooren:·"The second and third textbooks depict
the appalling facts quite literally. Perhaps, in both cases,
the text in the book could be a bit more concrete,
especially in the third example. The caption creates
confusion. A critical pupil would still be left with a
number of unanswered questions. Why had the boy's hands been
bound together? Who were the culprits? How was the girl's
village punished? Why was her hand chopped off after she had
been beaten to death? Are both the children from the same
village? It is never made clear that these crimes were in no
way exceptional, nor that they came about as a result of a
fundamental rejection of equality between black and white.
Nor are these points made clear in the other textbooks.
There will have to be a great deal more clarity before the
racist history of 'our own people' become a natural part of
our historical awareness. Some textbooks are moving in the
right direction, so there is some hope."
Evolution
According to western
notions, the manner by which mankind has developed methods
of food production is indicative of the evolutionary
process: hunter-gathering, simple agriculture using a stock
or hoe, or a nomadic lifestyle. Evolution has been a
progression from the Iron Age, via the Bronze Age, to the
present day, the era of modern man. Accordingly, pantheistic
religions precede a progression through polytheism to
monotheism. Barter as the basis of an economy is followed by
trade based on money. This notion of linear development
often serves as a mean to record European
history.
Problems arise as soon as
this developmental line is rendered a universal norm. When
applied to non-western cultures, it is often open to the
interpretation that 'others' are not as far advanced. They
are relegated to the position of representatives of an
earlier era.
'The people of the
Bronze and Iron Ages lived together in villages. They lived
on the produce of the land, and from their cattle. They also
gathered food and went hunting. (...) This way of living
still exists, for example, among the Wayana-Indians in South
America.' (16)
Naturally, one should
ask oneself if the idea of a graphically charted upwards
progression is such a bad one. Are we not much more advanced
than the beaker peoples and have we not learnt from our own
history? Leaving a definition of 'we' aside, less
generalisation is necessary if non-western cultures are to
be brought into the picture. The division of history into
developmental phases is somewhat arbitrary if one sees how
some cultures have by-passed various phases once contact is
made with that which is 'Western'.
The concept of development
as a linear progression is one that is widespread. This on
its own is sufficient to necessitate a critical perspective.
To augment European history with the cultural highlights of
other areas outside Europe calls the centrality of Europe as
initiator of change into question. This, however, is not
enough. Intercultural respect results from absorbing the
views of other peoples and cultures and putting emphasis on
cultural exchange and benefits instead of unilateral
influences and disadvantages.
4.4
Rich and Poor, North and South
"We live on the third
world from
the sun. Number three.
Nobody
tells us what to
do."
(Homi K. Bhabha)"
(10)
Inequality
The problems incumbent on
the North/South divide are the problems incumbent on
inequality in economic and political hegemony: the North is
rich in comparison with the South. The knack is to discuss
this inequality in such a way that both poor and rich are
dealt with in a respectful manner. If the western model of
progress remains the point of departure, then it is
unavoidable that some countries are depicted as needy,
lacking in knowledge and requiring help and advice. In this
way already existing prejudices are reinforced.
'Sixty years ago The
Netherlands was less developed than now. Here are a few
examples: a plough was pulled by a horse; the baker made his
rounds with a barrow; (...) cars were scarce and motorways
non-existent. Now there are tractors, delivery vans,
bathrooms with showers, washing machines, six-carriage
highways complete with traffic jams etc. All these things
are examples of modern development. All these things make
The Netherlands a developed country. But even in these
modern times there are countries without modern things.
Well, not entirely, but they are less well developed. It
would be more correct to say that they are still developing.
That is why we call them developing
countries.'(17)
This description is almost a
caricature of ethnocentrism: a developing country is a
negative image of our own country. People who live there
lack the things we have here. Pupils are asked to look at
photographs from this perspective. They take on the role of
traveller and regard the shortcomings they encounter
elsewhere from a somewhat superior position. The flip-side
of the material prosperity outlined here is never discussed.
Enthusiasm for personal acquisitions is wearing thin now
that the price in environmental problems is becoming
apparent. If all the attention is focused on developmental
issues, then poverty will be at the forefront and negative
depictions will dominate.
Education in
Developmental Issues
Education in issues related
to development is confronted with the difficult task of
dealing with poverty and inequality without reinforcing or
even evoking stereotypes. School textbooks can form a
counterbalance to the crudely drawn depictions to which
pupils will find themselves subjected elsewhere.
Firstly, there should be a
clear distinction between countries. From a western
perspective, there are more poor countries than rich
countries. Poor countries differ from each other in their
historical, economic and cultural background, and in the
nature of their problems. The solutions, therefore, are not
all the same.
Moreover, it is advisable to
reduce the absolute differences suggested between North and
South, for example, by drawing attention to poverty in the
North and wealth in the South.
One can take it a step
further still by putting the familiar and distorted
representations onto the agenda, as is the case in the
following piece of text, which refers to a photograph of an
African farmer spraying his fields.
"Africa. 'A lost
continent'?
You seldom see a
representation like the one in figure 12 on TV. Reportage of
events in Africa often have a negative bias. Is there then
nothing good that is newsworthy? Of course. But, when it
comes to collecting for charity, more money comes in if the
misery is clearly visible. But there are positive
developments. For example, in the Sahel there has been some
improvement with regard to food shortages; the exhausted
soil is being rendered fertile once again; and fewer young
people are migrating from rural areas into the towns."
(18)
Cause and
Effect
Political and economic
relations, both past and present, should always be an
essential element of any explanation of under-development.
The following quote cites an important cause of poverty in
developing countries and of wealth in the North.
'A colony had to sell
their raw materials to the mother country playing the boss
for very low prices. Because a country was forced to become
a colony, it lost its independence and could not develop any
further. However, Western European countries developed
themselves extremely well, especially due to the cheap raw
materials they got from the colonies, which consequently
remained poor or grew even poorer. As the colonies could not
develop themselves, even after they gained independent they
were still obliged to sell their raw materials for low
prices. It is hardly surprising that most of the developing
countries are former colonies.' (19)
Colonialism cannot provide
an answer to everything (some countries were never or only
briefly colonised), but a great deal can be explained from
this perspective. The above-mentioned quotation contains an
historical explanation clearly proposing that poverty and
wealth are not intrinsic to either the South or the North.
Moreover, this explanation provides insights into
present-day neo-colonial relations, national debts, and
trade barriers that form obstacles to more balanced economic
relations. In this sense the North is partially responsible
for improvement.
4.5 Racism and
Discrimination
The Division into
Races
The division of people into
different races (for example, yellow, black or white) does
not belong in education. Pseudo-scientific attempts to link
external and internal qualities with each other have been
proven to be insupportable.
People differ from each
other in an infinite number of ways. Skin colour is only one
of them. 'Race' was a experiment and an erroneous notion
even without all the half-baked racist notions that appeared
as a result. Consequently, it is even more painful to see
that some school textbooks approach the subject
uncritically.
'Imagine what it would be
like if all the people on the planet always stayed in the
place where they were born. They would never travel. There
would be no ethnic minority groups, only indigenous peoples.
A map on which the races were coloured in would look very
simple. You can see a map of this type in illustration 3.7.'
(19)
In what follows, the
mingling of races is explained as a consequence of
migration. It is as if races exist and originally had their
own unique characteristics. Moreover, the text suggests that
the world would be much simpler without ethnic minority
groups. 'Ethnic minority' is given a negative connotation. A
member of an ethnic minority group ('allochtone') is someone
who belongs elsewhere.
Before one is aware of it
happening, the distinction between a native-born person
('autochtone') and a non-native born person (allochtone') is
a question of race. Such a shift in meaning occurs
frequently:
"In our country there
are also Chinese people, Italians, Greeks and other groups.
It is clear that because of this The Netherlands has become
a multi-racial and multicultural society." (20)
In the above, 'race'
is linked unequivocally to culture. In the following example
the link with ethnicity is laid.
What do you notice
especially about this picture? (...) Do these children
belong to another race of people, yes or no? If they do,
they belong to the so-called ethnic minorities.'
(21)
'Race' is used to determine
the norm: white is normal, non-white is 'other'.
Furthermore, concepts of race, tribe, peoples and ethnic
minority status are lumped together.
A division of peoples into
races has no relevance in an educational situation. The
example given above make it clear that every discussion
generates another set of problems and that it is so easy to
unwittingly reaffirm racist associations. They are in
opposition to the objectives of intercultural
education.
In reality there is a
connection between skin colour and social position, but it
is racism that is at the root of this phenomenon and not
skin colour itself. This should form the basis of an
approach to the material in geography and history lessons.
It is evident that the following statement should not be
presented in lesson-material.
'Judaism, Religion and race
are closely linked in Judaism.' (22)
One can always decide to
skip over any survey of races one might come across in a
school textbook. Such a survey could also be used to deal
with the history of racism.

Italy
From:·O.
Bombardelli, Università di Trento, Facoltà di
Lettere e filosofia, Italy
Source:·Bacchi,
Gabriele, Corso di Storia: popoli, cultura, modi di vita.
Bologna: Calderini 1992
Bombardelli:
"This Amazon indian is a
primitive man. That is why we think he has nothing to teach
us. This is not true: he knows more about many natural
phenomena that we do."
Perhaps this is
well-intentioned. A positive perspective has been chosen,
but ultimately the caption is denigrating. The subtext is
actually saying that we know an great deal and he actually
knows something too. But the word 'primitive' is never
discussed.
In the past the term
'primitive' meant that a people were likely to be extinct
soon, and that they were definitely not our contemporaries.
This association seems to be present in the passage. On the
same page there is a drawing of a dodo.

Cultural
Arrogance
One weapon in the battle
against racism is the reference to a tradition of Dutch
tolerance: 'our' tolerance!
'In comparison with
other countries in the 17th century, we were a tolerant
people. The Jews were not persecuted for their beliefs or
their way of living. Over the years we have become very
proud of this tolerance. We have come to see ourselves as
the most tolerant people on the planet.' (23)
It has become a
precept of Dutch culture that one should not discriminate
against people on the grounds of beliefs or other
lifestyles. The cultural arrogance that is discernable in
the last sentence of the quotation above is responsible for
a denial of the very existence of racism and discrimination
in The Netherlands. The following quotation presents the
issue of tolerance in a more refined manner.
'For centuries The
Netherlands has had a reputation for tolerance. Tens of
thousands of foreigners came here because they would be free
to practise their religion here while they where persecuted
elsewhere. This tolerance was not only a result of
philanthropy, but political and commercial considerations
also carried weight. As a result of the tradition of
tolerance, it is more noticeable when intolerance and racism
manifest themselves in The Netherlands. Racism and
discrimination appeared to be problems that only affected
other countries, then suddenly they are close to home. But
were racism and discrimination really problems that only
affected other countries?' (24)
Subsequently, the text
refers to World War II and the fact that in comparison with
surrounding countries the highest percentage of Jews was
transported to the camps from The Netherlands. Moreover,
relatively speaking, there were more collaborators among the
Dutch than among occupied populations elsewhere and at
present The Netherlands admits fewer refugees than other
countries in Western Europe. The text rounds off with the
following:
'But, of course, there
are also many people in The Netherlands who are tolerant and
even actively involved in combatting racism and
discrimination. They go on demonstrations and refuse to
accept that people should be distinguished from one another
on the basis of colour, belief, temperament or whatever.'
(25)
One could combine this
with an assignment that requires pupils to approach
organisations in their own province that are active on
behalf of ethnic minorities or are involved in
anti-discrimination activities.
4.6
Notes
1
Verken je wereld, (Get to Know Your World) Groningen:
Jacob Dijkstra Educatieve Uitgeverij, 1986.
2 Wereldwijs( Worldly Wise), 1MHV. Den Bosch:
Malmberg, 1993. p.53.
3 Waarom Daar?
(Why There?), part 2. Den Bosch: Malmberg, 1985.
p.63.
4 Verken je
wereld (Get to Know Your World), part 6. Groningen:
Jacob Dijkstra Educatieve Uitgeverij, 1989.
p.70.
5 Geobas (Basic
Geography), part 2. Groningen: Jacob Dijkstra Educatieve
Uitgeverij, 1990. p.102.
6 Een wereld van
verschil (A World of Difference), part 2. Den Bosch:
Malmberg, 1990. p.11.
7 Radar,
Maatschappijleer voor bovenbouw HAVO/VWO
(Radar: Social Studies for GCSE ans 'A' Level).
Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff, 1994.
p.145.
8 Wereld-in-delen
(The World in Pieces), tekstboek part 2M. Haarlem:
Gottmer Educatief, 1983. p.124.
9 Sporen (Tracks),
part 3. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff, 1993. p.
172-173.
10 Route
aardrijkskunde (Roads Through Geography), part 3.
Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff, 1984.
p.27.
11 Kijk op de Tijd
(Look at the Time), part 1 MHV. Den Bosch: Malmberg, 3e
dr. 1984. p.128.
12 De Geo Geordend
(Organised Geography), part 2 LM. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff
Educatief, 1988. p.57-58.
13 De tijd zal het
leren (Time Will Tell), part 3. Zeist: Dijkstra, 1985.
p.63.
14 Sprekend
Verleden (Speaking of the Past), part 3 II. Rijswijk:
Nijgh & Van Ditmar Educatief, 1987.
p.124.
15 Sporen (Tracks),
part 3. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff, 1993.
p.251.
16 Bij de tijd
(With the Times), part 2. Den Bosch: Malmberg, 1986.
p.64.
17 De Geo Geordend
(Organised Geography), part 2. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff
Educatief, 1988. p.28.
18 Formule Bos
(Standard Woods), part 2. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff,
1994. p.63.
19 Driesprong (The
Three-Forked Road), part 2. Educaboek BV, 1985.
p.91.
20 Wereldbeeld
(A View of the World), part 1. Leiden: Educatief
Uitgeverij, 1994. p.15.
21 Verleden Tijd?
(Past Tense?), part 3. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff Educatief,
1987. p.179.
22 Wereldwijs
(Worldly Wise), exercise book 2. Den Bosch: Malmberg,
1994. p. 79.
23 Maatschappijleer
als opdracht voor het MDGO (Social Studies as aAssignment
Secondaru Vocational Education). Leiden: Spruyt, Van
Mantgem & De Does, 1990, p.24.
24 Vragen aan de
Geschiedenis (Questions of History), textbook part 3.
Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff, 1986.
p.218.
25 De multiculturele
samenleving; Waar sta jij? (The Multicultural Society:
What's your opinion?), (Kernthema's Maatschappijleer)
(Central Themes For Social Studies). Amsterdam: Meulenhoff
Educatief, 1996.
top
of page
|