|

|
KiesKleurig
a colourful
choise
handbook for international
teaching materials
Auteurs: Ineke Mok & Peter Reinsch
©Parel, Utrecht 1999
|
Chapter 3
Artistic Development
By Suzanne van Norden
Those who want to complement
educational developments in arts and crafts with an
intercultural perspective cannot expect to rely on the
support of an extensive bibliography or reports of
experience already gleaned elsewhere. The following is
compiled from notes and descriptions of practices, and is
intended as a source of inspiration for those teachers who
consider arts and crafts subjects as well as intercultural
education important for their pupils development.
In this chapter, Suzanne van
Norden reviews the artistic disciplines: drama, dance,
music, the pictural arts, audivisual subjects and
literature. Very little exists by way of written material
for those disciplines. Alongside suggestions for the
assessment of existing material, suitable ways to work
with artistic disciplines are being treated. The author
warns against folklorism and stereotypes and against the
tendency to see children explicitly as an exponent of their
non-western background. Alternateviley, it is dangerous to
endow those fields in which self-espression is of papamount
importnace with a cultural neutrality, while in reality they
are not easily put into practice by every group within the
population of The Netherlands.
3.1
Artistic Development in Education
Productive,
receptive and reflective
In all creative disciplines
a distinction is made between a productive, receptive and
reflective involvement with the arts. Productive involvement
means actually making something. Receptivity entails looking
and listening. Reflection implies thought or communication.
These three activities are sometimes strictly separated from
each other; sometimes they are brought together to form an
organic unity. The choice of options depends on the teacher,
the objectives and the practical opportunities
available.
The objectives of artistic
development, as they are generally defined, are remarkably
sweeping in their scope. Artistic development is considered
important for pupils not only in respect of their
orientation to the world, but also for their personal growth
and social development. In other words, it is more than
merely painting or writing a poem. It concerns 'the
development of creativity in thought, speech, gesture and
behaviour' (1) as well as what happens to you when you are
painting or looking at a painting, writing or reading a
poem. It concerns the way in which you and your experience
of the world is influenced and changed.
Therefore, the objectives of
artistic development can be general and broad in scope, and
they can also be limited and geared to a specific subject.
Artistic disciplines can be applied as a means to achieve
general developmental goals, but they can also be goals in
themselves. The discussion about which goal should be
foremost is one that has surfaced recurrently in the history
of artistic development.
Among projects that can be
construed as a part of 'intercultural artistic development'
one finds very few subject-specific definitions of
objectives. More often the primary aim would be something
general such as 'achieving respect for different
lifestyles', and artistic activities are seen as a
convenient means to reach that end. It is hardly necessary
to explain why artistic development, alongside other school
subjects, should be intercultural in essence. It is
necessary to attune this field to multi-ethnic classes and
the social proximity of different ethnic groups that occurs
outside school. Should one take the class to the Museum of
the Tropics as well as to the Rijksmuseum? Should Turkish
and Surinamese songs be included in a repertoire? Should one
employ artistic disciplines in projects about racism and
discrimination? The advantages and disadvantages of the
divergent approaches will be discussed here. First, however,
I would like to give an impression of the place accorded to
artistic development in education at the present
time.
For the average teacher in
primary education, artistic development in practice consists
of incidental drawing, singing and a short play. Few primary
schools have teachers specialised in drawing, handicrafts or
music; the class teachers usually have to decide for
themselves the way in which they can introduce 'creativity'
into their programme. In multilingual groups they will
certainly give priority to language and arithmetic, leaving
scant time over for a systematic application of the 'softer'
disciplines with a predetermined outcome in view. In
secondary education, a certain proportion of the basic
developmental project is set aside for artistic development
and the lessons are taught by trained teachers.
Artistic development
consists of more than drawing, handicrafts and music. The
term 'artistic development' is a collective term for six
subject areas or disciplines that are derived from the arts,
namely: pictorial development, dramatic development, dance
development, literary development, musical development and
audio-visual development. With the exception of audio-visual
development all these disciplines are mentioned in the
Primary Education Act.
As drawing, handicrafts and
music have a set place in the curriculum at primary and
secondary levels, there are specific instructional materials
for these subjects that extend over the entire educational
period, and on which schools can base a curriculum. As
regards drama, dance, literary and audio-visual development,
the teacher has to make do with incidental brochures, lesson
notes, project portfolios and documentation files. These
materials are often constructed thematically and disciplines
are combined with each other.
Besides the use of classroom
material, the school can also opt to employ a 'specialist'.
Due to a structural shortage of time experienced by most
teachers, this practice occurs frequently. Drawing and music
teachers are taken on by some schools, but more often,
especially for the other disciplines, the school turns to
consultants from establishments specialising in artistic
development. In some regions, an annual 'art offer' is made
to the schools so they can choose from a variety of support
programmes: museum visits, theatre performances, a series of
dance classes, a photography project, a series of language
printing sessions, a children's choir project. 'Consultants'
in artistic development take their own working methods and
sometimes their own instructional-material into the
classroom with them. Their goals vary; sometimes it is a
one-off event; sometimes the aim is to train teachers so as
to enable them to work independently with a chosen artistic
discipline.
3.2
Is Artistic Development Culturally Specific?
Innovation
and Tradition
In modern western society
originality, innovation and creativity are pivotal criteria
for assessment of artistic expression, along with the
emphasis on the artist's individual achievements. These
characteristics are reflected in the practice of artistic
development in the west during the last fifty years. In all
disciplines, encouraging the child's personal expression is
paramount. Inventiveness is highly-valued. The more
discoveries children make and the more ways they find of
expressing their personal experiences the better.
Art often has a different
function in non-western societies. Frequently, art has a
religious goal and is practised in accordance with
traditionally proscribed rules. Personal feelings are
subordinate to the rules and the individual expression of
the artist is less important than the religious or
philosophical function of the art work produced. As a part
of the appropriate artistic instruction, the pupil's
objective is to find her/his way around the practice of the
old tradition rather than to explore new and personal
avenues. The master instructs the pupil, whose eventual
expertise can only be the result of continuous practise over
a long period of time.
These differing appraisals of the values and function of art
can have consequences for an intercultural complementation
of artistic development in schools. The points of departure
for artistic development are a consequence of western
notions. Whether or not non-western notions can be easily
assimilated is questionable.
The Original and the Derivative
Most teachers of artistic
development put a high premium on originality: the
reproduction of cliches should be opposed. A tendency in
children to derive material from cliches can take many
forms: the identical rows of suns and flowers in drawings
made by girl's and the weapons and airplanes in those by
boys; copying popular comic book figures; playing
stereotypes; imitating popstars; the language used in
stories or poems; the mass appeal of certain American films
and television programmes. For most full-time teachers this
is not a problem. The pleasure children experience in this
kind of activity is their foremost concern and they lack the
knowledge and artistic experience needed to bring about any
changes. Only those teachers with a specialised training in
a subject look for forms and methods that can break through
the tendency to reproduce cliches. For this reason, in the
'Werkschuit' (now: Stichting Kunstzinnige Werkvorming
Amsterdam) in the fifties the term 'liberating technique'
was coined. It embraced techniques by means of which
children could be helped to produce pictures divorced from
the cliches or set ideas of beauty or ugliness. Techniques
such as cutting out printing blocks, painting with thick
brushes, tearing paper and making group pictures produced
unexpected results that were free from cliches.
In non-western cultural
traditions certain manifestations of cliches are highly
regarded. For religious reasons, Islamic children are
sometimes forbidden to draw people or animals. Instead, they
are praised for their skill in drawing minutely detailed
non-figurative decorations following an established pattern.
Other religions also embrace established symbols, a
particular application of colour and representations that
are repeated with only minor variations. To children from a
Hindu background, centuries-old stories of the Ramayana and
the Mahabharata form an inexhaustible source of material.
They are told time and again and re-shaped, even in comic
strips and films. And in many cultures the transmission
(and, therefore, the endless repetition) of old stories is
more important than coming up with something new. Almost
no-where in western education are children still obliged to
learn texts by heart; in Chinese and Koran schools this
practice is the predominant. Likewise, in Chinese and Arabic
cultures calligraphy is a separate and highly valued art
form, to which even children may apply
themselves.
Teachers will have to ask
themselves if these cultural traditions actually uphold
cliches that should be transcended . As a consequence, they
will also have to question the emphasis on originality,
authenticity and free expression in modern artistic
development. Could it be deemed 'ethnocentric' and should
there be a revision of the central notions encompassing
artistic development in order to render it
intercultural?
Counteracting Cultural
Bias
Intercultural artistic
development is not only intended for children from ethnic
groups, but equally for white Dutch children. All children
have both the need and the right to be put into contact with
the cultural backgrounds of groups outside their
own.
The acquisition of knowledge
is perhaps the least problematic area. A teacher can take on
some re-training and can be so inventive with materials that
s/he can confront pupils with examples of art from all kinds
of cultures and can tell them a great deal about it.
Receptive and reflective instructional-materials that are
geared towards the acquisition of knowledge can be easily
screened for cultural bias. The following questions serve as
a litmus test. When looking at pictorial art, are art works
from non-western cultures included? Are examples of
non-western music or dance on offer? Is attention paid to
non-western literary forms, such as the oral tradition or
specific poetic techniques? And if a diversity in culture is
offered, is non-western art systematically appraised 'less
important' or 'primitive' in comparison with western
art?
It becomes more complicated
when one is attempting to interculturalise the creative
products of artistic development. When children are asked to
express themselves personally, creatively, authentically or
originally, this itself entails a particular (western)
perspective on humankind. In this view, the human is an
autonomous individual, capable of self-determination and
able to make decisions independently. Towards the end of the
last century the notion developed in Western-Europe that
children are more spontaneous, uncomplicated and freer than
adults, and that education should respect and use this
individuality. This view was to form the basis for the term
'free expression' that came into vogue around 1950. The
pictorial arts were dubbed 'expressive arts' and were no
longer geared towards teaching children to draw but to let
them draw. Supervision was deemed unnecessary. Ten years
later 'teaching' made a come-back, however, and 'free
expression' became 'artistic development'. The individuality
is still central, but they can be taught how to give
expression to this by means of effective methodologies. Do
these views fit into the practice of artistic development
with an intercultural bias? Moreover, does this belong in
contemporary multicultural classrooms?
Children in a
Multicultural Netherlands
The schematic division into
western and non-western entails the danger that children
from ethnic minority groups will simply be regarded as
representatives of their parent's culture or that of their
country of origin. The direct experience of teachers with
ethnically mixed groups presents another picture. It is
certainly not true that all Turkish and Moroccan children in
The Netherlands are prohibited from drawing figures, nor
that all Surinamese children live with a musical cacophony,
nor that Chinese parents show no interest in their toddlers
first scribbles. And it is even less true that multi-ethnic
groups find it difficult to work successfully with existing
artistic forms.
There has been very little
systematic research undertaken into the role that ethnic
background plays when children are taking part in artistic
activities. There are many hypotheses and
suppositions.
Sometimes, when I am working
in a class on artistic development I suspect that children
from some ethnic groups never read or draw at home. And I
also suspect that drawings and dolls made at school by
Islamic children are never taken home because their parents
do not approve of them. Sometimes, I get the impression that
the children from ethnic minority groups become very
self-conscious when they are asked for their own feelings or
experiences of something. Or, I feel that they are extra
careful not to dirty their clothes when they are working
with printing techniques.
But I also discover
sometimes that Turkish children listen alternately to
Madonna and to Turkish music, or more often only to Madonna.
Sometimes Islamic children have a long row of coloured
crayons at home. White children go to piano and dance
lessons and are trained there in something geared towards
technical accomplishments. And Moroccan children play drums
at home and learn traditional dances from aunts and sisters,
while they also spend half the day watching MTV and
imitating the dances with their friends.
Finally, among white Dutch
children I have seen so many differences that it is
impossible to present a unambiguous picture of
them.
If something in general can
be said about the relationship between ethnicity and
artistic development, then it is perhaps this: children from
ethnic minority groups are probably better equipped to
function in various cultural contexts than Dutch children in
'white' schools. It is a necessity for them! The wedding of
a Moroccan cousin, at which men and women will absolutely
never dance together, is as important and as unavoidable for
a Moroccan child as the school party the day before where
boys and girls throw their arms around each other on the
dance floor. To one extent or another, children from ethnic
minority groups are all faced with the differences between
the western culture all around them and the ethnic culture
practised by their parents and relatives. The differences
can create tensions, but also lead to new possibilities for
expression. At school children should be given the space and
the support they need to look for forms of expression that
are most fitting for them at that stage of their
development.
In my opinion, intercultural
artistic development can only take place experimentally in
the field of tension between elements of different cultures.
There is no reason to stop children from ethnic minority
groups using 'self-expression'. There is every reason to
keep an eye on the effects of this on these children so that
the instructional-material can ultimately be adapted or
complemented accordingly. Alongside this, all children
should be systematically confronted with works of art and
techniques from non-western cultures. The latter should
dovetail with the steady increase in attention that is being
paid to techniques in all artistic disciplines at the
present moment.
Ethnicity, Folklorism and
One's Own Experiences
The relationship between
ethnic origins and participation in artistic development is
not uncomplicated. Actually, it is impossible to say in
general what role ethnicity plays in the child's daily
life.
Children from Turkish
origins will not feel Turkish all day long and to the same
extent, in the same way that white Dutch children will not
continuously feel Dutch. Usually, they feel simply
different: small, large, boy or girl, unhappy, tough or
sexy. They can be very proud of their Turkish origins, or
they can reject it, either all of it or just a small part.
This depends on the circumstances.
Teachers cannot just turn to
a child at any particular moment and address her/him on the
basis of their supposed ethnicity. It could have an
undesirable effect if one shoves a drum at a Surinamese
child with the instructions 'here, play the drum in a
Surinamese way'. Nor should one assume that children from
Ghanese origins would have a great deal to tell the class
after watching an African film. They can become very angry
or insecure, because they know nothing about, or want to
distance themselves from, that which is expected of them.
Equally, one could find them blossoming, exactly because
they have recognised something and suddenly they are the
'expert'.
For a long time, the
intercultural approach existed in schools in the form of
organised projects about countries and about Turkish,
Moroccan or Hindu celebrations, abundantly endowed with
exotic snacks, dances and music. This was intended to help
children from different ethnic groups approach each other.
In the meantime, this strategy has been rejected as
'folklorism': a reprehensible attempt to attract
contemporary Dutch children to a few colourful
characteristics of a country they have usually never
visited. While this criticism is justified, it pays too
scant attention to the obvious pleasure children could
nonetheless experience from this type of
'folklore'.
As an alternative to
folklorism the individual, personal experiences of the
children can be made central, by means of which extra
attention is paid to the ever different ways in which these
experiences are influenced by the ethnic background. In
artistic development, especially, where there is a
continuous search for an individual, authentic manner of
expression, it is important for teachers to learn how to
foreground something without pressure or
stigmatisation.
Another alternative can be
found in an approach which pays serious attention to
non-western art forms, by presenting and studying these in
their contemporary modes of manifestation, and by taking on
artists from various ethnic groups in establishments for
artistic development.
Museums, Concert Halls,
and Theatres
In most schools it is usual
for children to become acquainted with original works of art
through visits to museums or attendance at concerts or
plays. While some change is taking place, most of the art
found in museums is western, and the same can be said of
that which can be seen and heard on Dutch podia. Non-western
art is predominantly to be found in anthropological museums
or at special multicultural or folklore festivals. The works
are usually not exhibited then in their own rights, but
serve broader social goals, such as giving information about
the lifestyles of non-western peoples, or improving the
position of ethnic minorities.
This reflects the (steadily
changing) relationships between 'native' Dutch
('autochtone') and ethnic minority ('allochtone') groups,
but is also a consequence of the different function of art
in non-western cultures, in which works of art often have a
social function. This vanishes in the neutral museum
environment or on a disengaged, brightly-lit western stage.
An accompanying lecture or an information brochure changes
little. Rather, it could put the art in a more educational
context and, therefore, render it boring.
Alternatively, there is
something to be said for the practice of bringing
non-western art and performance into museums and theatres.
It can release non-western art from its anthropological
ambience and enhance its status as 'real' art. Furthermore,
it brings a wider cross-section of the public into contact
with different cultures. Perhaps it even renders the sphere
of professional art more accessible for laymen and amateurs.
It would be a fine outcome of receptive artistic development
in schools if attending a concert or visiting a museum
prompts the individual to feel the artistic urge and a will
to put it into effect.
It would be fine if the
range of exhibits and performances on offer were to become
more multicultural. One should be able to take children to
look at 17th century Dutch masters, but also to Chinese
water-colours or African statues, or to Matthew's Passion
and to a rai concert, to Swan Lake and Ghanese dancers, to a
play by Pinter and also an Indonesian Wayang performance.
Perhaps, contemporary artists from ethnic minorities could
be brought into the classroom. Then the children could start
painting, dancing, acting or making music
themselves.
For teachers there is also a
great deal of work to do if they are ready and willing. It
will not be easy to put such a multicultural scope into
effect. Secondly, the teacher will need to acquire a great
deal of new knowledge. Thirdly, it is impossible to predict
the ways in which children from different ethnic groups and
environments will react to the material. Art evokes
emotions. Teachers will be confronted with the whole gamut
from recognition, curiosity and enthusiasm to lack of
interest, resistance and anger. A concert of Turkish music
could divide a whole group of Turkish children into opposing
camps, because some children will want to identify with the
culture others will not. Dutch parents can also protest
against this type of approach, 'because the school is
already Turkish enough'. It requires tact, openness and
inventiveness to preclude suchlike conflicts.
3.3
In Conclusion
Artistic development is
about doing; making art, listening to it, looking at it
thinking and talking about it. The emphasis on one aspect or
another can be varied. At present little exists for
(prospective) teachers to help them come to grips with the
need to complement artistic development with
interculturality. In this chapter a number of problems have
been discussed and projects from six artistic disciplines
prioritising intercultural objectives and assumptions have
been cited. The following is a brief summary:
-·The objectives
of artistic development are sometimes instrumental, that is
they are the means by which a general developmental
objective can be achieved. Sometimes they are intrinsic:
they remain within the boundaries of the relevant artistic
discipline. In intercultural artistic development both are
to be found, depending on the approach. When personal
attitudes are concerned, such as having 'respect for other
cultures' and being 'open to cultural exchanges', the
objectives are instrumental. When the acquisition of skills
or knowledge is central, such as learning certain dance
steps or distinguishing between different musical
traditions, the objectives are intrinsic. Teachers she
scrutinize the lesson-material bearing the following two
questions in mind:
-·Are attitudes learned
by the children (in an active, receptive and/or reflexive
sense) likely to help them negotiate an independent path in
a multicultural society?
-·Does the material use
all the opportunities available for explaining art from
other cultures within the same discipline alongside western
art?
-·In a multicultural
society there are differences in the evaluation and status
of art. western attitudes often contrast with non-western
attitudes, but also within cultures there is no agreement
concerning the function of art. This does not preclude an
exchange and a blending of art forms. The teacher can try to
provide answers to the following questions, though the
answers will vary according to the discipline.
-·Which points of
departure concerning the function of art are fundamental to
this material? Are they typically western? If so, pupils
from another culture could be embarrassed, by stress laid on
certain skills, such as a capacity to express oneself in a
literary style of Dutch, or by being asked to draw a picture
of a deity or to express personal feelings.
-·Which (technical)
skills are being valued and taught through the material? And
which forms of creativity and originality are being valued
and encouraged? Are you aware, as a teacher, of the specific
objectives you are realising through artistic development,
and what effect your methods will have on different ethnic
groups.
-·The significance of
ethnicity both in everyday life and for children taking part
in artistic development in The Netherlands at the present
time is not a given. It is changeable and dynamic. What is
on offer in the intercultural artistic arena must take this
into account and be varied by definition. It is crucial that
the multi-ethnic nature of the class, and of The
Netherlands, is represented as self-evident, and that no
single pupil should be pigeon-holed on the basis of her/his
ethnicity. The following questions are
fundamental:
-·Does the material,
and the supervision, give each pupil sufficient room to
search for a means of expression that is most suitable to
her/his own development?
-·What are your
attitudes, as a teacher, to the pupils' ethnic backgrounds?
To what extent have these been gleaned from personal
statements made by the pupils themselves? How can you use
the art itself to ensure that pupils are given the
opportunities to express their own cultural background? Do
you given them the freedom to do this?
-·In existing projects
operative in the field of intercultural artistic development
there are a variety of intercultural supplements available.
Four approaches have been distinguished:
1. A non-western cultural
event is studied in detail. Try to do this as far as is
possible with the correct cultural context and function,
otherwise this method never moves beyond the study of
folklore.
2. Non-western or ethnic
artists and works of art are added to the western, or
non-ethnic. An exchange of the western and non-western,
rather than merely a complementation, would be ideal.
Teachers need to acquire knowledge of several cultures.
Museums and performances that display diversity can also be
put to use.
3. Universal themes should
be regarded from a variety of perspectives. Personal
experiences, such as loneliness, love, happiness and
sadness, as well as families, conflicts, work and friendship
are topics that find expression in all cultures and every
discipline. If this method is to be successful, a great deal
of cultural knowledge must be employed by the teacher and/or
the pupils. The diverse supplements that can be used with
these themes should ensure that both similarities and
differences between cultural traditions become
evident.
4.Ethnicity and
multiculturality as it is experienced by contemporary Dutch
children should be central to the projects. Not all
disciplines have had material developed that deals with
these aspects, however, the primary source should be the
pupils themselves. If they can exchange experiences with
each other, express themselves creatively and enjoy what
they are doing, then a great deal will have been
achieved.
3.4
Note
1 Schermel, Atie,
'Intercultureel onder-wijs en kunstzinnige vorming'
(Intercultural Education and Artistic Development). In:
Handboek Intercultureel Onderwijs (Handbook for
Intercultural Education) Alphen a/d Rijn: Samsom, 1989.
top
of page
|